Articles Contact

← Back to articles

Why not use a CMS like WordPress or Wix?

WordPress isn't bad, it's how you use it that matters. Our pragmatic approach to choosing the right architecture for your needs.

Lire en français →

You can. The real question is whether it fits your needs.

WordPress and Wix aren't bad. They're different approaches. They work well if:

  • You need autonomy to publish regularly (articles, pages).
  • Your initial budget is tight.
  • Your needs align with their standard use cases.

The real problem isn't the CMS. It's what you do with it.
Out-of-the-box WordPress is performant and secure. The issue arises when you need to expand features. A blog is simple. A corporate site with business integrations is another story. That's when you need plugins. And that's where things can break down:

  • Cascading dependencies 3-4 plugins can conflict with each other. You discover the flaw in production.
  • Security gaps A plugin abandoned 6 months ago is an open door. You patch manually or risk a breach.
  • Costs pile up Premium plugins for quality, updates, maintenance, debug time when it breaks.
  • Performance degrades Each plugin adds code. 10 plugins leads to a bloated and slower website with unnecessary dependencies.
  • Uncertain Web Core Vitals Very hard to achieve LCP ≤ 2.5s with a plugin-based architecture.
  • Accessibility and GDPR uncertainties Unless you audit every plugin, you're never sure you're compliant.

The good news: WordPress can be very viable. If you have a developer who deploys it right (not a template + 5 random plugins) — lean architecture, verified plugins, Web Core Vitals targeted, security hardened, WCAG/GDPR compliance — WordPress can do anything if treated like a full-fledged site that requires attention, not a "plug-and-play" solution.

At YellowCraft, our approach is pragmatic. In some cases, WordPress is the right answer. For example: you need to publish 10–20 articles a month, you don't have the budget for a full custom solution, but you want quality. In that case, we deploy WordPress — with the same standards as a from-scratch build.

  • No quick-fix plugins.
  • Guaranteed performance (measured Core Web Vitals).
  • Enhanced security.
  • Verified accessibility.
  • Documentation so you can manage publishing on your own.

Bottom line:

  • WordPress by default = growing risk with complexity.
  • WordPress done right = excellent tool with real guarantees.
  • YellowCraft = we do it right, or we build custom.

The question isn't "WordPress or custom." It's: "For your needs, who can do it right?"